The sham California lawsuit to silence me had not gone as planned. My exercise of federal remedies was unanticipated, and federal judges had to openly protect the scheme and the participants by unlawfully dismissing the actions. These judicial acts raised additional federal causes of actions, for which additional federal remedies existed. It was a literal perpetual motion scenario, as federal judges violated federal law, blocking my exercise of federal remedies, and thereby raising additional causes of action.
The method used by this daisy-chain of judicial obstruction of justice was to render a pattern of unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring me from federal court access and voiding for me the constitutional and statutory protections under our form of government. Although this was unlawful and unconstitutional, the crisis was now so bad that not much more could be lost by a pattern of overt judicial suspension of the constitution and laws upon which I relied.
Several months earlier, in late 1987, this same group seized my life's assets, including my real estate investments (motels, apartments, land, rental houses, and my home). The first of a series of orders was rendered, making me a man without a country insofar as the protections of law and Constitution were concerned. Judge Milton Schwartz rendered the first of many orders blocking my access to federal court. This order barred me from reporting federal crimes to a federal court, as required to be reported by federal crime reporting statutes such as Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. If I did not report the criminal activities to a federal court or other federal tribunal I would be guilty of a federal crime. Since I obviously couldn't report the crimes to the same Justice Department officials who had been deeply involved in the criminality, the only avenue open was to report the crimes to a federal court. As a citizen concerned about criminality in government, I also had the right, in addition to the responsibility, to make the reports to a federal court.
To this day I haven't had my day in court on any of the issues raised in any of the federal filings, since 1974. Every federal judge who received my federal filings blocked my right to have a federal court declare the validity of the five judgments and the important personal and property rights established by those judgments. I was suffering greatly by their refusal to make the declaration and by the acts of the renegade California judges. I was suffering the effects of the continuing hard-core civil and constitutional violations, and I was entitled, like any other citizen, to relief that only federal judges could provide.
In 1986 U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz at Sacramento rendered an order dismissing my attempts to obtain the declaratory judgment and to obtain relief from the ongoing pattern of civil right violations. In that order, he barred me from ever filing any federal action seeking relief or reporting the federal crimes, which was then followed by an escalation of previous acts by California judges and the Friedman law firm.
Exercising rights and responsibilities under our form of government, I filed two lawsuits in the United States District Court in the District of Columbia,(112) naming as defendants the FAA, NTSB, the Justice Department, and Judge Milton Schwartz. In these lawsuits I sought to give testimony and evidence about the criminal acts I had uncovered; to obtain an order halting the violations of federally protected rights; to declare my rights in the five judgments; and declaring as void the order barring me from federal court access. Each of these issues constituted a major federal cause of action requiring the U.S. District Judge to perform his duty.
U.S. Attorney David Levi and U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz retaliated against me for having exercised these rights and responsibilities belonging to every citizen in the United States. Schwartz issued a March 1987 Order-To-Show-Cause (OSC) for me to appear in federal court at Sacramento on April 23, 1987, to explain why I should not be held in civil contempt for filing the federal lawsuits. Schwartz argued that I was in contempt of court for filing the federal action when his May 30, 1986, injunctive order permanently barred me from federal court access...