CHAPTER EIGHT

COMPLICITY BY
FEDERAL JUDGES

In their positions of trust federal judges are paid, and have the mandatory duty, to provide this federal court access and relief.(63) In addition to the statutory right to federal court access and relief the First Amendment to the Constitution(64) provides additional safeguards so that no one goes through what I went through (and am still going through).

I exercised these rights. For instance, when a divorced person exercises his or her constitutional right to change residence, his or her previously adjudicated personal and property rights in a divorce must be recognized by judges in another state. He or she cannot be subjected to another divorce twenty or thirty years later, invalidating subsequent marriages and bastardizing children, as was done to me in the sham California action. In the bizarre action taken against me, one of the remedies arose under the Declaratory Judgment Act and statutes. These remedies required(65) a federal judge to declare the validity of each of the five prior divorce judgments, and the validity of my divorced status and property rights.

When a California judge refuses to recognize any of the prior judgments entered in five different states (including California), and refuses to recognize the divorced status and property rights, federal courts are the only remedy. In my case, to declare these rights, the U.S. District Judge must first apply federal law that requires recognition of the judgments, and then secondarily apply state law if it conforms to federal law. In my case, any one of over a dozen state and federal doctrines of law, constitutional rights, and statutes, required the California judges to recognize the rights established in the five judgments.

Because the state judges inflicted great harm upon me while violating my civil and constitutional rights, there were additional federal statutes insuring that I have access to federal court. These remedies also provided jurisdiction to obtain financial damages against the state judges and the Friedman law firm. This relief arises under the Civil Rights Act, among other statutes, which is embodied in Title 42 Section 1983.(66)

When two or more people act to do a certain thing it is called a conspiracy. It was obvious that the various attorneys in the Friedman, Sloan and Ross law firm and the California judges were acting together to violate the law, inflicting great harm upon me. This conspiracy violated another section of the Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C.  1985.(67)

If any person knows that your civil rights are being violated, and they have the power to prevent or aid in the prevention of these violations, and they don't do so, other federal statutes provide federal court jurisdiction and relief...

63)

Title 28 U.S.C.  1331. Federal question. "The federal courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."

64)

The First Amendment to the Constitution provides That "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the [the right] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

65)

Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2201 to declare federally protected rights.

66)

Title 42 U. S .C . Section 1983: Every person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects...any citizen of the United States...to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress."

67) Title 42 U. S .C . Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights-Preventing officer from performing duties.

(1) if two or more persons...conspire to prevent...any person from accepting or holding any of office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties.

(2) if two or more persons conspire...for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person ... of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws...in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

Defrauding America Title Page

Ordering Information:

Copies are $25 each, plus shipping.
Volume discounts are available (see form)

To Order

Just download and print this order form.

or call

1 (800) 247-7389

and tell them you saw it on the Internet!